<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Breaking News: Michael Jackson slashed, shot, shelled, and finally disappears!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thethirdestate.net/2009/06/breaking-news-michael-jack-slashed-shot-shelled-and-finally-disappears/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thethirdestate.net/2009/06/breaking-news-michael-jack-slashed-shot-shelled-and-finally-disappears/</link>
	<description>What Is The Third Estate? Everything. What Has It Been Until Now In The Political Order? Nothing. What Does It Want To Be? Something.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 04:47:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Sloss</title>
		<link>http://thethirdestate.net/2009/06/breaking-news-michael-jack-slashed-shot-shelled-and-finally-disappears/comment-page-1/#comment-45067</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Sloss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 07:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thethirdestate.net/?p=833#comment-45067</guid>
		<description>Very funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tendai</title>
		<link>http://thethirdestate.net/2009/06/breaking-news-michael-jack-slashed-shot-shelled-and-finally-disappears/comment-page-1/#comment-1200</link>
		<dc:creator>Tendai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thethirdestate.net/?p=833#comment-1200</guid>
		<description>This sounds a bit like the &#039;not-the-end-of-the-world&#039; dichotomy. Surely there are a lot of things that aren&#039;t in that category but are a proper subject of public dismay? Looked at from a distance, perhaps it seems decadent to mourn a pop music artist. But in the case of somebody as prominent and culturally significant as Michael Jackson, I think this is an understandable  subject for public dismay. Human beings have always mourned selectively. I don&#039;t see a contradiction in expressing momentary dismay about it, while remaining concerned, today and tomorrow, about the other pressing issues in the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds a bit like the &#8216;not-the-end-of-the-world&#8217; dichotomy. Surely there are a lot of things that aren&#8217;t in that category but are a proper subject of public dismay? Looked at from a distance, perhaps it seems decadent to mourn a pop music artist. But in the case of somebody as prominent and culturally significant as Michael Jackson, I think this is an understandable  subject for public dismay. Human beings have always mourned selectively. I don&#8217;t see a contradiction in expressing momentary dismay about it, while remaining concerned, today and tomorrow, about the other pressing issues in the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://thethirdestate.net/2009/06/breaking-news-michael-jack-slashed-shot-shelled-and-finally-disappears/comment-page-1/#comment-1199</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thethirdestate.net/?p=833#comment-1199</guid>
		<description>Good video. Posted it on my facebook page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good video. Posted it on my facebook page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

