Dear Nick, the government really must be present at PMQs

This post was written by Reuben on July 24, 2010
Posted Under: Democracy,Liberal Democrats

There is a lot that is cruddy about our democracy, from the  piss-stained benches of the House of Lords to our absurd system of voting. Yet many would agree that the tradition of Prime Minister’s Questions is something to be proud of.  The weekly opportunity for our elected  representatives to hold the government to account, to have questions their answered, and to force the government to clarify its positions is arguably of some importance.

Nick Clegg however appears to take the sovereignty of parliament somewhat less seriously. This week he found himself in awkward position. Standing in for Cameron at PMQs, he declared that the Iraq war – which his coalition partners backed – had been an illegal war.  As even the Telegraph now recognises, his position was correct. Less impressive, however, was the way in which he backed out of this tight spot.  Realising that he had made a boo-boo, Clegg declared after the event that he had been speaking in a “personal capacity”.  As the guardian’s Nicholas Watt noted it is “an apparently new constitutional convention that the second most senior member of the cabinet is now free to stand at the dispatch box and express opinions of his own that do not reflect government policy”.

The point is this: there is nothing wrong with Nick Clegg expressing purely personal opinions while talking to his wife, or addressing a public meeting or blogging. But PMQs exist so that parliament can get answers from the government. It is the means by which parliamentarians can push, and sometimes cajole, the government of the day into clarifying its positions and going on record regarding matters of public interest. Up until now, MPs could tell whether they were being answered or just fobbed off. The impact of the Clegg innovation is that MPs may have no way of knowing whether the government has given them an answer and made its position clear, or whether they have simply been treated to the personal musings of whoever happens to be at the despatch box. Thus Nicolas Watt is right to ask how MP’s will know in future “whether Clegg is speaking as deputy prime minister”.

To be fair to Clegg, I would imagine that he was motivated more by a desire to smoothly extract himself from a difficult situation than a desire to attack the power of parliament. Yet this too is telling. Nick Clegg is a Liberal, and parliamentary sovereignty is to Liberals what the welfare state is to social democrats. To call it a sacred cow is an understatement. That Clegg appears willing erode the sovereignty of parliament simply ease himself out of an awkward  situation indicates, once again, that he is man who is not especially  burdened by serious political principles or very strongly held  beliefs.

Like this article? Print it, email it, Stumble, Facebook and Tweet it:
  • Print
  • email
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Live

To contact Reuben email reuben@thethirdestate.net

Share

Reader Comments

How often is the position of government really scrutinised in detail at PMQs? Cameron, like Blair, is slick, well versed in PR and spin, and good at dodging the question. Rather than giving a true insight into the positions of the government, these answers give us a sugar-coated version that governments think we want to hear. Nick Clegg’s moment in the spotlight, while a bit of a gaffe for him, was a bit of refreshing honesty. The Iraq war was illegal. Just because Cameron supported it, doesn’t make that untrue. And I’d rather hear truth at PMQs than spin.

#1 
Written By Salman Shaheen on July 24th, 2010 @ 11:13 am
Jacob

I don’t think that’s an entirely fair assessment, Salman, insofar as I think most governments would consider themselves to have a far easier time if they didn’t have to deal with PMQs every week.

#2 
Written By Jacob on July 24th, 2010 @ 12:24 pm

A fair point Jacob, I don’t disagree, but I don’t think that fact makes my arguement any less true.

#3 
Written By Salman Shaheen on July 25th, 2010 @ 6:47 pm

Add a Comment

required, use real name
required, will not be published
optional, your blog address

Please leave these two fields as-is:

Protected by Invisible Defender. Showed 403 to 453,941 bad guys.