A Conservative-Lib Dem merger would be bad news for the Left

This post was written by Owen on January 3, 2011
Posted Under: Elections,Liberal Democrats,Tories

There have been growing mutterings recently about the prospect of the Coalition becoming an outright merger between the Tories and Lib Dems sometime between now and the next general election. I don’t know how likely it is – the prospect of strong resistance from rightwing Tories who take the same view as Fraser Nelson in the article I’ve linked to above and (to a lesser extent) leftwing Lib Dems who still have a conscience makes me sceptical – but if it did happen I don’t think it would be Spectator readers and their ilk who’d really regret it. The first commenter at the bottom of Nelson’s piece writes:

Merger means the LibDems of the Orange Book persuasion becoming Conservatives, does it not? And the sandal-wearing twats will join Labour, giving them a dreadful headache. All this will be excellent news for the Greens, who will become the third party. Don’t you think, Fraser?

I’d take issue with the language, but since most socialists probably have as much contempt for sandal-wearing Lib Dems as rightwing Tories do, I realise I probably wouldn’t get much sympathy. The more glaring problem with the comment, though, is the supposition that the Greens and Labour would be the major beneficiaries of a merger between the coalition parties. I agree that those on the right of the Tory party would do badly out of it (so Nelson’s consternation is understandable), but I really don’t see how any party on the left would gain from it either.

Image: Financial Times photos/flickr

In terms of electoral support, YouGov currently has Labour at 41%, the Tories at 39 and the Lib Dems on 9 – +12, +3 and -14 points compared to the general election in May, respectively. This suggests a pretty large chunk of left-leaning Lib Dem support has already gone to Labour – which isn’t surprising, given both the coalition’s policies and the Tories’ deftness in making the Lib Dems scapegoats for those policies. What hasn’t happened is any significant rightward erosion of Tory support, but if there was a merger it could happen.

So where would all the disillusioned Thatcherites go? Well, UKIP pretty clearly fits the bill best: economically conservative, anti-immigration, climate change-denying, big on defence, and, of course, about as Eurosceptic as you can get. And let’s not forget that it was they, not the Greens, who came fourth in terms of votes cast last May (to say nothing of coming second in the EU elections the year before). So there’s a real chance of UKIP getting a boost in support if a Conservative-Lib Dem merger goes through.

Another possibility, though (which isn’t incompatible with the first) is that the new merged party could do extremely well. It would be very easy for a party led by Cameron and Clegg to paint itself as closer to the centre ground than Labour, particularly if it had the support of the Murdoch press (and a wholly Murdoch-owned Sky News, courtesy of Jeremy Hunt). Right-leaning Lib Dem supporters would vote for the new party, while the left-leaning ones would have been lost to Labour, the Greens or disgusted apathy long before. If this happens, the main electoral losers are going to be on the left, not the right.

Like this article? Print it, email it, Stumble, Facebook and Tweet it:
  • Print
  • email
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Live

Reader Comments

Interesting piece. I can’t see this realistically happening but if it did I could certainly see things panning out as you suggest.

Written By Majeed on January 3rd, 2011 @ 5:06 pm

A ‘merger’ would simply be a spin-doctor’s way of repackaging the collapse and disintegration of the LibDem Party. (a repeat of the collapse of the Liberal party nearly a century ago).

In both cases the destruction of the Liberals comes as a result of huge movements of protest. A century ago it was the Suffragettes, Ireland and the rising Trade Union and Labour movement that did for the Liberals.

This time round it looks like the Students and the Trade Unions will again be the gravediggers of the LibDems.

How this show of the strength of ordinary people when they move into protest and industrial action can be seen as ‘bad’ for the left, I really cannot understand.

Written By Riversider on January 3rd, 2011 @ 9:07 pm

Well, the precise causes of the collapse of the Liberal Party are notoriously fairly contentious – A Level History taught me that much – but as to why it would be a bad thing, it’s simple. Assuming most of the people currently down in the polls as supporting the Tories and Lib Dems stay with the new coalition party (which seems reasonable, as most leftish people who supported the Lib Dems last May seem to have already abandoned the party, and the exodus from the Tories to UKIP probably won’t be on anything like the same scale), they’ll be the party with the biggest share of the vote at the next general election by a long way, able to paint themselves as centrists and will probably have Murdoch’s backing, so the left will be buggered. I don’t see what’s so hard to understand.

Written By Owen on January 3rd, 2011 @ 9:26 pm

Coming to this thread eighteen months after it was published it is interesting to see just how much has changed in the interim – Murdoch wont be putting anyone else in power, ever again. Indeed, it is all he can do to remain nominally in charge of his own company. As for the disintegration of the lib dems – I would say both the big parties will benefit equally, creating a duopoly in which either one can beat the other, say 45-44% in the popular vote and win a thumping majority in parliament. Good for labour and tories – bad for democracy. You only have to look at the US to see how useless their system is.

Written By Alex on April 7th, 2012 @ 1:01 pm

Add a Comment

required, use real name
required, will not be published
optional, your blog address

Please leave these two fields as-is:

Protected by Invisible Defender. Showed 403 to 490,706 bad guys.

Previous Post: