Referendum vote result: across the divide, the political classes line up against the people

This post was written by Reuben on October 24, 2011
Posted Under: Uncategorized

Well the results are in, and the motion calling for a referendum on Britain’s membership of the EU was defeated by 413 votes to 111 – courtesy of all the major political parties. The political classes have, in other words, lifted two fingers to those whom they are supposed to represent. It has been clear for years now that if Britain’s EU membership was put to a referendum, the no-camp would win hands down. Meanwhile 70% of people want a referendum. And yet this majority opinion finds no expression amongst any of the major parties.

The powers that, every 5 years we lend to parliament are not theirs to give away at will . And yet give them away they have. In 2008, none other than Nick Clegg remarked that nobody under 51 had been asked their opinion on Britain’s relationship with Europe. In the meantime we have reached a situation in which 15-50% of our laws (depending on who you believe) are handed down from the only faintly democratic institutions of Brussels.

It is often said by demos- fearing Europhiles, that referenda are “not a part”of the British constitution, and that our relationship with Europe therefore need not require one. According to one commentator, a referendumon the EU “could potentially undermine the very foundations of how our political system works”. Things are in fact not so black and white. Before the Liberals curtailed the power of the Lords in 1910 they were compelled to hold another election – the second in the year – precisely on that issue. THe principle here was that when it comes making “organic change”, that when it comes to actually changing the rules of the game a simple parliamentary majority does not suffice (in the same way tht it would be constitutionally legitimate for a government to assume power and then vote through 50 year electoral terms).

Since Britain was last asked to join the EU the rules of the game have changed and changed again – as Economic integration morphed into partial political union. When various European publics delivered their negative verdict on the European constitution, it was repackaged as the Lisbon Treaty. We now have an EU president upon who we were not merely denied a vote, but denied even the opportunity to express an opinion – since his candidacy was not even announced to the public. It is a tremendous understatement to say that it is high time that the British given a say in how, and from where , they are governed.

Like this article? Print it, email it, Stumble, Facebook and Tweet it:
  • Print
  • email
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Live

To contact Reuben email reuben@thethirdestate.net

Share

Reader Comments

Paddy

Interestingly, if you think of the european parliament as another layer above our house of commons, it is another degree of separation between citizens and decision making. Kind of ironic when Europe is supposedly the cradle and champion of democracy. The counter argument is that from a business/trade/economy point of view, we will lose much from leaving the EU. That could be seen as trading our rights for money.

Are we trading for our rights in that case? No, because our mps just traded our rights for us.

On the other hand, you can see this as a triumph for pragmatism vs ideology, pointing to the Conservatives as the most ideological party, and the liberal democrats as the least ideological party (but we knew that all along).

#1 
Written By Paddy on October 25th, 2011 @ 11:28 am

Add a Comment

required, use real name
required, will not be published
optional, your blog address

Please leave these two fields as-is:

Protected by Invisible Defender. Showed 403 to 464,429 bad guys.