<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Third Estate &#187; gagging order</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thethirdestate.net/tag/gagging-order/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thethirdestate.net</link>
	<description>What Is The Third Estate? Everything. What Has It Been Until Now In The Political Order? Nothing. What Does It Want To Be? Something.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 14:26:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What The Guardian&#8217;s Banned From Telling You</title>
		<link>http://thethirdestate.net/2009/10/what-the-guardians-banned-from-telling-you-a-third-estate-exclusive/</link>
		<comments>http://thethirdestate.net/2009/10/what-the-guardians-banned-from-telling-you-a-third-estate-exclusive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 21:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Owen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carter ruck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gagging order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trafigura]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thethirdestate.net/?p=2462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this evening The Guardian was served with a gagging order forbidding it from reporting parliamentary business. To quote the article in the paper itself: Today&#8217;s published Commons order papers contain a question to be answered by a minister later this week. The Guardian is prevented from identifying the MP who has asked the question, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 0px 0px 5px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="box_count" share_url="http://thethirdestate.net/2009/10/what-the-guardians-banned-from-telling-you-a-third-estate-exclusive/"></a></div>
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fthethirdestate.net%252F2009%252F10%252Fwhat-the-guardians-banned-from-telling-you-a-third-estate-exclusive%252F%22%2C%20%22shorturl%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2FiKot1H%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22What%20The%20Guardian%27s%20Banned%20From%20Telling%20You%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p>Earlier this evening The Guardian was served with a <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/oct/12/guardian-gagged-from-reporting-parliament">gagging order</a> forbidding it from reporting parliamentary business. To quote the article in the paper itself:</p>
<blockquote><p>Today&#8217;s published Commons order papers contain a question to be answered by a minister later this week. The Guardian is prevented from identifying the MP who has asked the question, what the question is, which minister might answer it, or where the question is to be found.</p>
<p>The Guardian is also forbidden from telling its readers why the paper is prevented – for the first time in memory – from reporting parliament. Legal obstacles, which cannot be identified, involve proceedings, which cannot be mentioned, on behalf of a client who must remain secret.</p>
<p>The only fact the Guardian can report is that the case involves the London solicitors Carter-Ruck, who specialise in suing the media for clients, who include individuals or global corporations.</p></blockquote>
<p>The right to report on what’s said and done in Parliament is traditionally seen as pretty important in a democracy, so in an attempt to aid transparency, the Third Estate can <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">exclusively</span> report that the question is <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">(probably)</span> <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmordbk2/91013o02.htm">this one</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>61 N: Paul Farrelly </strong>(Newcastle-under-Lyme): To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what assessment he has made of the effectiveness of legislation to protect (a) whistleblowers and (b) press freedom following the injunctions obtained in the High Court by (i) Barclays and Freshfields solicitors on 19 March 2009 on the publication of internal Barclays reports documenting alleged tax avoidance schemes and (ii) Trafigura and Carter-Ruck solicitors on 11 September 2009 on the publication of the Minton report on the alleged dumping of toxic waste in the Ivory Coast, commissioned by Trafigura.</p></blockquote>
<p>Trafigura, of course, is the company that was recently revealed to be not only <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/sep/21/journalists-collaborate-trafigura-scoop">dumping toxic waste</a> into the sea near Ivory Coast, but also trying very hard to make sure no one found out. Why they and Carter Ruck would be so keen for this question not to be revealed I’m not sure, (especially as it’s clearly publicly available), but they have a <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot/2009/sep/17/trafigura-libel-laws">history</a> of this kind of behaviour.</p>
<p>All the questions due to be asked in Parliament from tomorrow (Tuesday) onwards can be found <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmordbk2/cmob2.htm">here</a>, so feel free to have a browse through the rest of them – <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">it’s possible I guessed wrong, though I think it’s unlikely</span>. And please, please re-post this – the more places publish it, the harder it is to justify a gagging order and the worse Carter Ruck and Trafigura will look.</p>
<p>Edit: <a href="http://richardwilsonauthor.wordpress.com/">This guy</a> found it too (and a bit sooner than me I think).</p>
<p>Edit edit: You can download a copy of the Minton Report, which Trafigura is so keen you don&#8217;t read, from Wikileaks <a href="http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Minton_report:_Trafigura_Toxic_dumping_along_the_Ivory_Coast_broke_EU_regulations,_14_Sep_2006">here</a>. (H/t <a href="http://www.chickyog.net/2009/10/13/trafigura/">Chicken Yoghurt</a>)</p>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>Related Posts:</h3><ul><li><a href="http://thethirdestate.net/2010/04/the-price-of-philantho-capitalism/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">The Price of Philanthro-Capitalism</a></li><li><a href="http://thethirdestate.net/2009/10/update-on-the-guardian-trafigura-we-win/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Update on The Guardian/Trafigura: We Win!</a></li><li><a href="http://thethirdestate.net/2009/10/jan-moir-tries-and-fails-to-defend-the-indefensible/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Jan Moir Tries (And Fails) to Defend the Indefensible</a></li><li><a href="http://thethirdestate.net/2011/05/superinjunctions-for-every-trafigura-theres-a-ryan-giggs/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Superinjunctions: For every Trafigura there&#8217;s a Ryan Giggs</a></li><li><a href="http://thethirdestate.net/2011/02/isas-tax-avoidance-and-beards-why-some-criticisms-of-ukuncut-are-just-stupid/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">ISAs, tax avoidance and beards: why some criticisms of UKUncut are just stupid</a></li></ul></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thethirdestate.net/2009/10/what-the-guardians-banned-from-telling-you-a-third-estate-exclusive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

